DTC optimization: Difference between revisions

From pCT
Hpe090 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Hpe090 (talk | contribs)
Line 12: Line 12:


== Results ==
== Results ==
=== Resolution ===
All following values are given in units of Water Equivalent Thickness! (Except the absorber thicknesses)
All following values are given in units of Water Equivalent Thickness! (Except the absorber thicknesses)


Line 47: Line 50:


[[File:resolution_7mm.png|1200px]]
[[File:resolution_7mm.png|1200px]]
=== Accuracy ===
[[File:accuracy_2mm.png|1200px]]
[[File:accuracy_3mm.png|1200px]]
[[File:accuracy_4mm.png|1200px]]
[[File:accuracy_5mm.png|1200px]]
[[File:accuracy_6mm.png|1200px]]
[[File:accuracy_7mm.png|1200px]]

Revision as of 11:15, 23 March 2017

Geometry and segmentation optimization of the Digital Tracking Calorimeter

Optimization philosophy

Geometry

Materials

Software

The software for this project is Gate installation and the DTC toolkit. For a complete guide to use the software for optimization, see the page Software for design optimization.

Results

Resolution

All following values are given in units of Water Equivalent Thickness! (Except the absorber thicknesses)

How many layers are needed?

Pre-straggling resolution is the contribution to the total resolution from the detector smearing. This is calculable because we know the range straggling from Monte Carlo simulations, and the pre-straggling resolution is a subtraction in quadrature.

Material Thickness [math]\displaystyle{ t / \sqrt{12} }[/math] WEPL Resolution Excess straggling Pre-straggling resolution Layers for 230 MeV + [math]\displaystyle{ 5\sigma }[/math]
Al 2 mm 1.5 mm 4.16 mm 6.1% 1.38 mm 67
Al 3 mm 2.1 mm 4.26 mm 9.2% 1.69 mm 48
Al 4 mm 2.7 mm 4.35 mm 12.4% 1.97 mm 39
Al 5 mm 3.3 mm 4.50 mm 16.4% 2.28 mm 32
Al 6 mm 3.9 mm 4.70 mm 23.3% 2.73 mm 27
Al 7 mm 4.5 mm 4.76 mm 26.0% 2.78 mm 23


Accuracy